Being, Existence, Though

Saying- An imperative of “again” in correlation to the “there is”

There is- The void and the dim- ‘in the existence of the disappearance

SUBSCRIBED IN BEING!!!

The modality of saying can be interpreted in several ways??

INSCRIBED IN VISIBLE HUMANITY

‘In and by thought the configuations of visible humanity and the imperative of saying exist simultaneously’ (p.94)

At first body and space but eventually we being to know we need the head- THINKING

QUESTIONS- BEING FOR BEING, BEING FOR APPEARANCE

SKULL THOUGHT-iTSELF EXPOSED

‘Existence is the generic attribute of what is capable of worsening. What can worsen exist. “Worsening” is the active modality of any exposition to the seeing of the clenched staring eye and the oozing of words.’ (P.99) EXISTENCE

FAILURE!!!

METAPHORS!! LOVE!!

SYMBOL OF EXISTENCE!!

OWN SYMBOL OF BEING!

EXISTENCE AGAINST

PAIR OF TWO ADDED TO THE ONE-BODY AND SPACE

THOUGHT MAKES 3

Theses on Theatre

The false Movements of cinema

 

Theatre- CHANCE

Audience must be counted- Critque

AN EXPERIEMNT

AN EVENT TO PLAY/CHALLENGE AN IDEA

 

‘In the theatre it is explicity-almost physically-a question of the encounter of an idea, while in cinema (at least that is what I am about to argue) it is a question of the passage of the idea’ (p.77)

A film wothdraws from the visible

The GLOBAL movement, The LOCAL movement, the IMPURE MOVEMENT (P.81)

JUDGEMENT- The film we expect against the film we argue with

HIDDEN MEANINGS

 

‘Cinema inverts the literary imperative, which can be expressed as follows: To make it so that the purification of impure language clears the path for unpredicatble impurities’ p.88

Dance as a metaphor of thought

‘Dance is innocence, because  it is a body before the body’, A body before the social constructions?

opposite to dancing body….dance as a metaphor is the internal!!

Dance goes against the impulses, against the propriception!! It is that moment when the body is unconstrained!!

‘Dance would mimic a thought that had remained undecided, something like a native (or unfixed) thought. Yes, in dance, we would find the metaphoe in the unfixed’ P.61

Principles of dance:

1.The obligation of space

2.The anonymity of the body

(The dance is never someone!!)

3.The effaced onmipresence of the sexes

(Sexuation, Desire and Love)

4.The subtraction from self

(Dance without a dancer, dance undanced. True dancer never know the dance she dances. The unknown!!)

5.Nakedness

Dance as metaphor is nothing else than the dance itself- ‘The event given before the name)

‘Exposes nakedness of concepts’

6.The absolute gaze

 

‘Dance is not an art, because it is the sign of the possibility of art as inscribed in the body’ P.69

Dance shows us the body is capable of art!!- THE BODY THAT THINKS!!!

A french Philosopher Responds to a Polish poet

A Philosophical Task: To be Contemporaries of Pessoa

We (the reader) percieve the poem, making meaning of it through the world. APPEARANCE AND OPIONIONS!!

The reader must enter into the mystery of lanuage, the hidden points<<<ENIGMA, This is the ‘moment of presence’ without this the ‘poem does not operate’.

Is the Enigma a guide for the reader to take position to think!! The truth lies not with the ordinary but with the unknown, the inconsistencies!!!

The enigma occurs through the disappearance of the poet and the pure existence of the poem??!! The enigma allows our desires to be seduced??

 

 

‘The transcendent ideality of the concept is directed against the creative immanence of life: The eternity of the true is a mortifying fiction, seperating each being from what it is otherwise capable of on the basis of its energetic differentiation’ (p.37)

‘at the beginning of the forgetting of being, as the inception of what is ultimatly nihilistic with metaphysics’

The virual body- The body of becoming not being- not to restrict go against another but to differentiate from.

Pessoa – ‘writing is thought itself and nothing but’- ‘a poem is what must never be interpreted’- ‘the task of grasping the mathematics of being’

It is only what it is says and can be understood this way as long as language remains the same!!

‘To be worthy of Pessoa would mean accepting the coextension of the sensible and the Idea but conceding nothing of transcendence of the One’

 

What is a poem?, Or, Philosophy and Poetry at the Point of the Unnamble

Philosophy is truth?

A poem/lanuage allows us to think why/ what we think what we think.

‘poetry is a thought that is not a thought, a thought that is not even thinkable. But the sole stakes of philosophy are precisely to think thought, to identify thought as the thinking thought itself’ (p.19)

‘The poem’s relelatory power turns around an enigma, so that making out the very point of the enigma is the poweless Real of the power of true.’ (p.23) The desires thought out of the poem are what make the poem thinkable??!! The poem tells the truth of the writer/reader, not the poem itself.

‘We could thus say that the unnamble proper to matheme is the consistency of language, while the one proper to poetry is the power of language’ (p.26)

The truth of math can only be true as long as the language remains the same- as long as 1 remains as 1. Language is used in poetry as the power to provoke meaning to another- the power not as the poem as truth but the language to enable truth through one that interprets it?

‘a truth can never reveal the meaning of meaning, the sense of sense’ As the truth lies within the desires that are unnamed!! the UNDEAD!!!