Art and philosophy
Art and philsophy are linked like Lacan’s ‘Master and Hysteric’- The art is presented to us, the truth lies within the art, philopsophy speaks of that truth?! The art cannot be the art within the audience percieving it?
Didactic schema- ‘Its thesis is that art is incapable of truth, or that all truth is external to art’ (p.2)….The art itself does only comment of explore it does not tell a truth. The truth may lie in the artist who produced the work or the reader of the art.
How art work effects others is at the essence of art? whether that be the artist producing the work or the others that view it.
Romantic Schema- ‘Its thesis is that art alone is capable of truth’ (p.3). A eductaional viewpoint. The art contains knowledge- the knowledge is a truth.
‘ART IS THE ABSOLUTE AS SUBJECT’ -Philosophy the Father- art the son- CARNATION.
Classical Schema- Aristotle
‘Art- as the didactic schema argues- is incapable of truth. Its essence is mimetic, and its regime is semblance.’
‘This incapacity does not pose a serious problem (contrary to what Plato believed) This is because the purpose (destination) of art is not in the least truth. Of course art is not truth, but it also does not claim to be truth and is therefore innocent.’ (p.4)
‘In Lacan and Freud, art is concieved as what makes it so that the object of desire’ (p.7)
Does this come back to the Triangle of Symbolic, Imaginary and Real.
How do I read the art?
What is art?
What is truth?
‘Basically, to make truths manifest means the following: to distinguish truths from opinion’ (p.15)
Is the art an opinion? The truth comes in the self?